Cooper Village & Stuyvesant Town: Can’t Quite Walk Away

When Tishman Speyer Properities and Blackrock announced a few weeks back that they would default on their $3 billion mortgage loan, it looked as though the principal owners of New […]

When Tishman Speyer Properities and Blackrock announced a few weeks back that they would default on their $3 billion mortgage loan, it looked as though the principal owners of New York City’s sprawling, 11,000-unit Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town would follow the national trend of simply walking away from their mortgage, ceding their loan to creditors.

But walking away is apparently harder than they had anticipated. Reports surfaced yesterday that the owners had to pay roughly $90 million in back taxes before giving control over to lenders. According to Bloomberg News:

Even in foreclosure, any property transfer in Manhattan requires payment of city and state taxes, and Tishman is negotiating with CWCapital, the special servicer for the senior debt, over who must pay them.

Bloomberg quoted Rafael Cestero, New York City’s commissioner of Housing Preservation and Development:

“The reality is they can’t just turn back the keys.”

Tishman and Blackrock purchased the complexes, spread out over 80 acres of Manhattan’s East side and originally built in the 1940s as affordable housing for returning veterans, in 2005 for $5.4 billion — the largest residential real estate transaction in history. The sale sparked an immediate reaction from tenants and advocates, amid owners’ plans to raise rents, “evict illegal occupants and upgrade with amenities including a gym, concierge service and new gardens,” according to Bloomberg, in what was viewed as a threat to some of the last affordable, market-rate housing in Manhattan.

Those efforts, however, were put to rest after tenants won a court challenge claiming that Tishmanhad wrongfully raised rents and deregulated apartments after receiving special tax breaks.

Related Articles

  • A Black woman in blue flowered dress and dusty pink hijab speaks into several microphones. In foreground, blurry, are news cameras. The woman is part of a large group at a rally, carrying signs promoting rent stabilization and saying "Home to Stay MPLS"

    Affordable Housing Sector Split on Rent Control

    May 21, 2024

    In the Twin Cities, where voters have recently supported rent control, most nonprofit housing developers have stayed silent, and some have openly lined up with the developers and landlords who oppose it.

  • Seven people wearing jackets and caps on a city sidewalk holding signs that say "Listen to UREB," "Save Our Homes," "Negotiate with UREB," or "5,000 Against Displacement." One person is speaking into a microphone. At the curb by the speaker is a van with WRLC painted on the side, for Western Reserve Land Conservancy.

    Nonprofit to Close Mobile Home Community to Build a Park

    May 10, 2024

    Ohio’s largest conservation land trust has been accused of purchasing a manufactured housing community with the very intention of closing it, evicting more than 100 households in the process. But proponents of the park’s closure say the land's failing infrastructure—and the benefit the property will bring to an entire city—is what forced the decision.

  • Partial view of two houses, semi-attached. The one on the left has been updated and renovated and looks shiny and new. The one on the right is dilapidated, with broken orange roof tiles, grimy and boarded-up windows, and climbing plants taking over the walls.

    In the Rush to Build, Existing Affordable Housing Is Falling Apart

    May 9, 2024

    With attention—and funding—focused on new housing supply over preservation and operations, even mission-driven nonprofit affordable housing managers are struggling to maintain decent conditions in older affordable housing.