Gentrification Keeps Trying to Improve its Image

Over time the conversation about gentrification has gotten much more complex.

The latest report on gentrification in American cities is also the latest to try to give it a decent name. The new study says that gentrifying areas actually attract quite a few residents in lower to middle parts of the income range, particularly Latinos. The study also points to income gains from gentrification spread more widely across the poor-to-rich spectrum and among more racial groups than one might expect. Black householders with high school degrees appear to gain a larger share of the rise in income in gentrifying areas than college-educated whites.

This follows up on the work of Lance Freeman of Columbia University in 2005. He found that many people with low incomes were eager to reap the benefits of gentrification in their neighborhoods. In addition, he didn’t find evidence that many people were being displaced from their neighborhoods, though when they left of their own accord they were often replaced by the better-off.

[RELATED: What Does Gentrification Really Mean?]

These findings, while well-researched, led to an equally well-researched response from other academics who drew much less positive conclusions. Specifically, research by Kathe Newman and Elvin Wyly found that if it hadn’t been for rent regulation in New York City, where Freeman did his study, many more people would have been displaced.

Recent studies on gentrification have certainly added a lot of nuance to a debate that used to be pretty simple. In the past people would say gentrification was bad, on its face. The very word has a pretty negative connotation. But over time the conversation about gentrification has gotten much more complex. For example. it’s not just upper-class whites who are moving into formerly low-income areas and communities of color. It’s sometimes black middle class newcomers who are moving into these neighborhoods, as well. The newer research also points out other distinctions besides race and class in gentrifying neighborhoods, like the way homeowners sometimes have a more dominant role than renters in community organizations.

I haven’t seen the latest study yet, and wouldn’t count on the brief review in Time Magazine to give me a thorough analysis. But I expect the latest study, “Who Gentrifies Low-Income Neighborhoods?” to encourage a lively discussion.

Related Articles

  • Illustration of a right hand holding a small red two-dimensional house between thumb and index finger. The hand is dark blue and the arm, shown a bit beyond the wrist, is wearing a white shirt and suit jacket. The background of the image is a city skyline, in lighter shades of the same blue, with puffy clouds above.

    Ownership Matters: Institutional Investors and Corporate Ownership

    May 23, 2024

    Who owns our homes is an absolutely essential part of housing policy, and an even greater part of housing politics.

  • A Black woman in blue flowered dress and dusty pink hijab speaks into several microphones. In foreground, blurry, are news cameras. The woman is part of a large group at a rally, carrying signs promoting rent stabilization and saying "Home to Stay MPLS"

    Affordable Housing Sector Split on Rent Control

    May 21, 2024

    In the Twin Cities, where voters have recently supported rent control, most nonprofit housing developers have stayed silent, and some have openly lined up with the developers and landlords who oppose it.

  • Seven people wearing jackets and caps on a city sidewalk holding signs that say "Listen to UREB," "Save Our Homes," "Negotiate with UREB," or "5,000 Against Displacement." One person is speaking into a microphone. At the curb by the speaker is a van with WRLC painted on the side, for Western Reserve Land Conservancy.

    Nonprofit to Close Mobile Home Community to Build a Park

    May 10, 2024

    Ohio’s largest conservation land trust has been accused of purchasing a manufactured housing community with the very intention of closing it, evicting more than 100 households in the process. But proponents of the park’s closure say the land's failing infrastructure—and the benefit the property will bring to an entire city—is what forced the decision.