New Report Dampens Outlook for Would-Be Homebuyers

While few housing advocates have unbridled hopes for truly affordable homeownership in Manhattan—where in order to live “comfortably,” a family of four needs nearly $170,000 in income—the recent reporting of […]

While few housing advocates have unbridled hopes for truly affordable homeownership in Manhattan—where in order to live “comfortably,” a family of four needs nearly $170,000 in income—the recent reporting of the New York Times on the super-rich’s use of shell corporations to buy $19 million apartments should still at least startle us.

For far too many of everyone else, homes are beyond their budgets, and the hope of homeownership is compromised by largely stagnant earnings and damaged credit.

In January, CFED released its annual Assets & Opportunity Scorecard, which measures 135 policy and outcome areas in five different categories: Financial Assets & Income, Businesses & Jobs, Housing & Homeownership, Health Care and Education. Many of the measures rise and fall with the national and local economies, but also reflect on how narrow and shallow the recovery has been.

The major findings of the report suggest that the rebound has not extended evenly across demographics. As in 2013, the national poverty rate last year was 14 percent, reflecting the lack of wage growth and good employment opportunities in certain communities. Another hangover of the recession has been the hit Americans’ credit has taken: 56 percent of consumers have subprime credit, making borrowing an expensive choice to finance life’s necessities let alone anything even vaguely entertaining.
As a key to most families’ wealth, for household balance sheets to improve, so must homeownership across various markets. There is some good news, though. For example, delinquent loans are down in the United States. Likewise, foreclosures have dropped considerably, in part because 32 states have moved to assist families in crisis. Nevertheless, homeownership, at 63.5 percent, is at levels not seen since the early 1990s. And while CFED and others do not advocate for anything but safe loans based on the ability to repay and other good underwriting, this trend is not only concerning, but also meshes with other trends in the market.

Communities of color have been hit particularly hard. Such households have a 45 percent homeownership rate, compared to 71 percent for white families. The recession worsened an already unequal wealth distribution across race. Major news outlets are reporting this crisis, but we have to first learn the lessons of the past, both negative and positive, before we can truly move forward.

The use of high-cost mortgages, as defined by the Home Ownership Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), are on the rise in 42 states. Eight states have reduced support for first-time homebuyers in such areas as counseling, which can be critical to successful homeownership, though additional research is certainly needed. Perhaps the federal government, through the efforts of the Federal Housing Administration and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, will give first-time homebuyers some needed assistance, which can counter, to a point, bad policy choices at the state level.

Much what has been behind our nation’s new reticence on homeownership may be due to the discredited meme in some circles that mortgages to low- and moderate-income buyers, spurred on by reckless federal policies, caused the meltdown. Slowly but surely, national media are acknowledging the research that shows the facts are very different than the storyline laid out in some circles.  

We know that solid underwriting and servicing can lead to successful homeownership and wealth building. We also know that poor underwriting, predatory lending and under-regulated market players each greatly contributed to the wealth stripping of communities across the country.

As we start to rethink our approach to homeownership, repairing the wealth gap and shoring up communities, policymakers and advocates need to focus on the basics. Wage growth; strong, clear and consistent regulatory regimes; and the development of transparency in the marketplace are needed so consumers can make reasonable choices about their futures. And you thought this would be hard.

(Photo credit: Flickr user Mason Masteka, CC BY-SA 2.0)

Related Articles

  • A mural on a rough whitewashed wall. Painted in dripping capitals is "Follow your dreams," and over it is a red stenciled "Cancelled" banner. To the right is an image of a man holding a pail and paintbrush. He's wearing a cloth cap and has two rolls of paper under his arm.

    Keeping Wealth in the Family

    December 15, 2023

    The role of 'heirs property' in eroding Black families' wealth

  • An aerial view of a large, four-story, U-shaped housing development, still being built, and surrounded by settled neighborhoods on the three sides that are visible. The roof is white and the various sections of the exterior walls are blue, tan, brick, or white. The ground around the structure is still raw dirt, with several trucks and machines in view.

    Can Residents Get More Out of Tax Credit Housing?

    November 21, 2023

    Arrangements in which LIHTC tenants share in the development’s financial benefits, or become partial or full owners, are rare—but some properties have pulled them off. This scan of several examples shows the possibilities—and the conditions needed for them to succeed.

  • An across-the-street view of a large domed building with broad steps leading up to the pillared front. Two people on the sidewalk are taking a photo, and two others are strolling by. The sky is a deep autumnal blue and the trees lining the plaza are in bright fall reds and oranges.

    West Virginia Tackles Vacancy With Tax Reform

    September 22, 2023

    In 2018, Shelterforce wrote about the Center for Community Progress's recommendations for tax reform in West Virginia to address vacancy. Guided by CCP's suggestions, the state auditor’s office has recently passed two laws to change its tax sales process and keep properties in use.