Banks Cleaning up Their Mess to Count as CRA Credit?

Financial regulators proposed yesterday to allow all activities carried out under the auspices of NSP to count toward a lender’s CRA compliance. This would only last as long as NSP […]

Financial regulators proposed yesterday to allow all activities carried out under the auspices of NSP to count toward a lender’s CRA compliance. This would only last as long as NSP is in effect.

So, for example, donating foreclosed properties in targeted areas to community developers; financing the purchase and rehab of foreclosed, abandoned, or vacant properties; or loans, investments, and services that support the redevelopment of demolished or vacant properties in those areas all would count.

My first reactions to this are mixed: On the one hand, of course, those sound like very worthy CRA-related activities and if it helps open the spigot a little for difficult-to-get-financing, that would be great.

On the other hand, it is a little uncomfortable to feel like (yet again) we’re going to the institutions that got us into this mess and patting them on the back for participating in the clean up at all. (Though it should be noted that CRA-regulated lenders were far less to blame for bad loans than those not covered by CRA.)

I can easily picture some frustrated neighborhood-level folks wondering why a bank should get credit for offloading worthless properties they’re not maintaining and making them someone else’s problem, for example.

Still, knee jerk sense of justice aside, for the most part it seems like this would be a good thing, giving additional weight to those inside these institutions who are trying to move the overwhelmed bureaucracies they are a part of toward prudent, neighborhood stabilizing lending and REO practices.

Or would it divert money away from traditional CRA activities, since CRA credit could be gained by doing things lenders are already under pressure from other quarters to do (or eventually will figure out are good for their balance sheets)? What do you think?

Related Articles

  • Illustration of a right hand holding a small red two-dimensional house between thumb and index finger. The hand is dark blue and the arm, shown a bit beyond the wrist, is wearing a white shirt and suit jacket. The background of the image is a city skyline, in lighter shades of the same blue, with puffy clouds above.

    Ownership Matters: Institutional Investors and Corporate Ownership

    May 23, 2024

    Who owns our homes is an absolutely essential part of housing policy, and an even greater part of housing politics.

  • A Black woman in blue flowered dress and dusty pink hijab speaks into several microphones. In foreground, blurry, are news cameras. The woman is part of a large group at a rally, carrying signs promoting rent stabilization and saying "Home to Stay MPLS"

    Affordable Housing Sector Split on Rent Control

    May 21, 2024

    In the Twin Cities, where voters have recently supported rent control, most nonprofit housing developers have stayed silent, and some have openly lined up with the developers and landlords who oppose it.

  • Seven people wearing jackets and caps on a city sidewalk holding signs that say "Listen to UREB," "Save Our Homes," "Negotiate with UREB," or "5,000 Against Displacement." One person is speaking into a microphone. At the curb by the speaker is a van with WRLC painted on the side, for Western Reserve Land Conservancy.

    Nonprofit to Close Mobile Home Community to Build a Park

    May 10, 2024

    Ohio’s largest conservation land trust has been accused of purchasing a manufactured housing community with the very intention of closing it, evicting more than 100 households in the process. But proponents of the park’s closure say the land's failing infrastructure—and the benefit the property will bring to an entire city—is what forced the decision.