Policy

Federal Stimulus Threatened to Overrun Small Town with Sprawl

The federal government has a history of subsidizing sprawl, wittingly or not. Even the Clean Water Act contains a mechanism that, according to my NRDC colleague Nancy Stoner, “continues to […]

The federal government has a history of subsidizing sprawl, wittingly or not. Even the Clean Water Act contains a mechanism that, according to my NRDC colleague Nancy Stoner, “continues to fund new sewage treatment plants and new sewage and stormwater collection systems in greenfields, i.e., currently undeveloped or working landscapes.”

In my opinion, new development should pay its own way, or at least make a justification as to why a government subsidy is in the public interest when all factors, including the consequences of sprawl, are considered. The problem is vividly illustrated by a controversial new development recently proposed for a 924-acre site near the small village of Trappe, Maryland, in a rural area east of the Chesapeake Bay.

Trappe, whose current population is 1,146, sits about 80 miles southeast of Washington, DC, on US Route 50, the main highway through Maryland’s Eastern Shore, in between the larger towns of Easton (pop. 11,708) and Cambridge (10,911). Trappe’s population was about to increase more than fivefold with a new development that would have been made possible by some $18 million of federal taxpayer money for wastewater infrastructure, in this case from the federal stimulus package.

Never mind that the Talbot County Preservation Alliance says that the fiscal costs of the project would have exceeded its benefits by millions, and that it would have caused average taxes paid by current residents to triple. The project was supported by the Trappe town council but opposed by the county government and by state comptroller Peter Franchot from the start, and eventually the town leaders withdrew the proposal amid acrimonious debate. The county actually had a competing proposal to use stimulus funds to facilitate hospital expansion in another town.

Where the heck was Maryland’s vaunted smart growth program in all this, you may wonder? The whole point, after all, is to prevent subsidy from flowing to sprawl. Sadly, the short answer seems to be, “missing in action.”

For more of the story, with photos and links, please visit my extended post on my NRDC blog.

  • In a city square, perhaps a park, four workers in white protective jumpsuits and wearing masks lift a tent into the back of a garbage truck, while three others look on. Nearby are other tents and jumbled personal belongings, blankets, and clothes. In the foreground, a throw pillow printed with the words "But first, coffee" lies in the dirt.

    Criminalizing Homelessness Doesn’t Work, Study Finds

    July 3, 2025

    The analysis shows that these laws, including bans on sleeping outside, don't reduce homelessness. Why are they on the rise?

  • Close view of parts of a tattered flag. The red and white stripes are seriously frayed and can't be resewn. The blue background is faded in places to a light blue.

    Trump’s Big Ugly Bill Is a Loss for Housing

    July 2, 2025

    The tax bill includes a significant expansion of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit. However, its other provisions, especially cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, are so harmful that the affordable housing field should not be celebrating.

  • Two very similar apartment buildings side by side fill the frame, with a strip of blue sky above. The one on the left has been renovated and painted a putty color, and looks fresh and clean. The one on the right looks old and dirty and has missing windows and broken masonry.

    What Happens if Trump Kills Section 8?

    June 30, 2025

    The Trump administration wants to nearly halve funding for federal rental assistance and make the states figure out how to distribute what’s left. Tenants, landlords, and housing providers say the fallout would be catastrophic, spiking homelessness and destabilizing communities.