VASH and LIHTC Can Work Together to Support Veterans in Housing and Beyond

Earlier today, the U.S. Senate advanced Ben Carson’s nomination to lead the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), setting up for a final vote later this week. As […]

Mother in uniform hugging young child

From the Minnesota National Guard, via flickr, CC BY-ND 2.0

Earlier today, the U.S. Senate advanced Ben Carson’s nomination to lead the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), setting up for a final vote later this week. As we await this vote, it’s a good time for those of us in the field to carefully assess existing housing programs in an effort to effectively advocate not only for their continuation, but enhancement. An example of this is the Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing voucher (VASH).


The VASH voucher program is a partnership between the Veterans Administration (VA) and HUD. VASH enables not only housing rental assistance through the Housing Choice Voucher program, administered by local Public Housing Agencies, but also provides essential case management and clinical services through the Veterans Administration at participating VA medical centers and authorized community-based outreach clinics.


Combined with the Housing First approach, VASH’s primary goal is to not only end veteran homelessness overall, but to sustain veterans in permanent housing. Overall, the program has been extraordinarily successful in meeting these goals. Since its inception, over 85,000 vouchers have been awarded, motivating Congress to provide new funding in 2012, making an additional $75 million available that fiscal year. Per the latest data available, 80 percent of those enrolled in the Supportive Services for Veteran Families program were transitioned to permanent housing.


In light of this accomplishment, the continued careful execution of this program should be a priority for HUD. More than 700,000 veteran households are paying more than 50 percent of their income on housing—an unsustainable percentage. Such a burden results in high housing turnover rates which harms the financial performance of a housing asset, and leaves unstable communities in its wake. This is where VASH proves to be instrumental.

Besides the veterans’ resident supportive services element, VASH includes the Housing Choice Voucher, which reduces the rental burden of the veteran by making quality affordable housing that utilizes Low-Income Housing Tax Credits attainable. Where the voucher subsidizes tenant’s rent so that they pay 30 percent of their actual income, the LIHTC program offsets the cost to develop affordable housing by generating investment equity, reducing the actual debt needed to pay for the cost of the development. This in turn reduces the need to charge higher rent, and creates affordability.


Many Qualified Allocation Plans (QAPs), the annually produced document that regulates state LIHTC allocation criteria, specifically require some level of resident services as a condition of a tax credit allocation—which is, in Rainbow’s opinion, a tremendously important component of the program. Services for veterans can directly correlate to lower turnover and thus consistent income.


While vouchers have been used in LIHTC for years to reduce the rental burden, arguably the most important component of VASH is the resident services. VA case managers work with veterans to address issues that may be barriers to an improved quality of life and mitigate housing eviction risk. The property managers, resident services provider, and VA case manager must work to get to know the needs of the veteran resident in order to develop the wrap-around supportive services that allows the voucher to be leveraged for more than housing. Outside of achieving operational success, both the LIHTC program and the VASH program have regulatory needs that must be met to be truly successful. It is important to gather a knowledgeable development team when considering the utilization of these affordable housing programs. Contracting the right resident services team with the operational sustainability, acknowledged track record, and ability to successfully coordinate the tenant intake efforts of the property manager and VA case worker is essential to the long-term overall success.


Long an advocate of combining housing plus supportive services, we know that getting housed is key; however, the wrap-around supportive services are what make the housing successful and sustainable for everyone involved.

Related Articles

  • Illustration of a right hand holding a small red two-dimensional house between thumb and index finger. The hand is dark blue and the arm, shown a bit beyond the wrist, is wearing a white shirt and suit jacket. The background of the image is a city skyline, in lighter shades of the same blue, with puffy clouds above.

    Ownership Matters: Institutional Investors and Corporate Ownership

    May 23, 2024

    Who owns our homes is an absolutely essential part of housing policy, and an even greater part of housing politics.

  • A Black woman in blue flowered dress and dusty pink hijab speaks into several microphones. In foreground, blurry, are news cameras. The woman is part of a large group at a rally, carrying signs promoting rent stabilization and saying "Home to Stay MPLS"

    Affordable Housing Sector Split on Rent Control

    May 21, 2024

    In the Twin Cities, where voters have recently supported rent control, most nonprofit housing developers have stayed silent, and some have openly lined up with the developers and landlords who oppose it.

  • Seven people wearing jackets and caps on a city sidewalk holding signs that say "Listen to UREB," "Save Our Homes," "Negotiate with UREB," or "5,000 Against Displacement." One person is speaking into a microphone. At the curb by the speaker is a van with WRLC painted on the side, for Western Reserve Land Conservancy.

    Nonprofit to Close Mobile Home Community to Build a Park

    May 10, 2024

    Ohio’s largest conservation land trust has been accused of purchasing a manufactured housing community with the very intention of closing it, evicting more than 100 households in the process. But proponents of the park’s closure say the land's failing infrastructure—and the benefit the property will bring to an entire city—is what forced the decision.