Housing problems are growing and are likely to worsen with pervasive income inequality and a U.S. population projected to grow by 80 million people by 2050. Yet, the solutions do not match the demand.
If social inclusion and the creation of mixed-income neighborhoods is embraced by so many, why does it seem to be so difficult to materialize this vision for the city? Let's look at some examples.
We can’t build our way out of the housing crisis . . . but we won’t get out without building.
Do we need more mixed-income housing? Why or why not? The following data and observations were collected via a survey we conducted from late January through mid-February, distributed via Shelterforce Weekly and social media.
A single development with an intentional income mix involves very specific challenges—both in its design and its management.
The HOPE SF program is aiming to explicitly avoid many of the problems mixed-income public housing redevelopments have faced, to create a truly inclusive process.
A focus on housing connected to education and wellness will be needed to break the cycle of intergenerational poverty.
Community lenders try to address the capital crunch faced by small businesses of color.
For first-time homebuyers with good credit, stable employment, and savings for a down payment, buying a home is more affordable than it has been in decades. For everyone else, however, lower home prices have been a disaster.
Building when you could buy is inefficient—and contributes to economic segregation.
An influx of more affluent families and their resources and advocacy is just what every struggling school needs, right? Well . . .
Baby boomers are the largest percentage of business owners, and they’re headed toward retirement. The worker cooperative movement wants to keep the jobs they’ve created from disappearing.
Everybody hates public housing, except the low-income people who live there and the people on the long waiting lists to get in. After years of neglect, the Obama administration wants to save public housing for future generations. Let's let them.
Shelterforce authors discuss the roles of place, mobility, and displacement on health and neighborhoods.
The federal government's Home Affordable Modification Program has a lot of mass appeal. But banks have been slow to act and HAMP was never intended to be the sole solution to the foreclosure crisis. HAMP needs backup.
One culture’s idea of the ideal house is different from another. Luckily, floor plans are adaptable.
Austin, with prodding from advocates, pushes its economic development policy to go beyond big deal chasing.
Serious flaws in the Road Home program have kept many hard-working homeowners from coming back to the Lower 9th Ward. Let’s not repeat them after the next disaster.
Two organizations in New Jersey show that with a good working relationship, a balanced approach to healthy communities and housing choice for all can be more than pretty words.
Community development corporations find ways to embrace new immigrant communities and new challenges.