When it comes to President-elect Donald Trump’s policy stances on HUD, there are a lot of unknowns. Housing advocates aren’t exactly sure what to expect, but they’re looking to the president-elect’s rhetoric, what his previous administration did, and a conservative initiative dubbed Project 2025 to speculate about what may come.
During Trump’s first four years in office, his administration was repeatedly thwarted from making drastic changes to the agency’s policies and budget, like slashing HUD funding by nearly 20 percent and decimating the public housing capital fund. Project 2025 sketches out an even more extreme future, including a proposal to dismantle the agency. But there are checks on the executive branch’s power to make those changes.
HUD’s Future as an Agency
Ben Carson, who served as HUD secretary during Trump’s first term, penned a section in Project 2025’s policy guidebook, which raised alarm bells with this incendiary proposal: addressing the agency’s “mission creep” by transferring HUD’s responsibilities away from the agency to other agencies, state governments, and localities. Some programs should be consolidated, Carson wrote, others done away with completely.
Sarah Saadian, senior vice president of public policy and field organizing at the National Low Income Housing Coalition, says that moving programs to different agencies would require approval from Congress. “And for Congress to do that, they would need 60 votes in the Senate, which means Democrats would have to agree to it,” says Saadian, making it a difficult proposal to accomplish.
Carson also calls for staffing changes at HUD, directing the administration to choose political appointees to head HUD’s individual offices, and put “motivated and aligned leadership” in place through Senior Executive Service transfers. He also calls for a new HUD task force dedicated to eliminating Biden-era measures that promote what it calls “progressive ideology.”
Funding for Housing
Trump’s agenda for public housing and voucher programs could mainly consist of defunding them.
During Trump’s first four years in office, the administration repeatedly proposed budgets that slashed HUD funding by almost 20 percent year-over-year. The proposals even did away with some programs entirely, completely defunding the National Housing Trust Fund, the Community Development Block Grant Program, the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, and more.
The proposals cut funds for the housing choice voucher program, which in Trump’s first year in office would have put the housing of more than 250,000 families at risk. Trump also made repeated efforts to eliminate the Public Housing Capital Fund program, which covers public housing repairs and redevelopment. Congress didn’t approve the cuts.
Cutting that funding in the coming years would be a step in the wrong direction—the backlog of maintenance and repair needs on the nation’s public housing stock has been estimated at $70 billion. The Public Housing Emergency Response Act would have provided those funds, but it’s been sitting in limbo for years.
In Project 2025’s policy guide, Carson also suggests selling off the public housing stock. However, Susan Popkin, a public housing policy expert and an Institute fellow at the Urban Institute, says that the administration “can’t just do that. HUD doesn’t own the public housing. Individual housing authorities do. . . So it seems to me that whoever wrote that wasn’t familiar with the actual situation on the ground.”
[RELATED ARTICLE: How Fast Could Financial Regulations, Treasury Programs Change Once Trump Takes Office?]
Instead, Popkin says, the new administration might increase the number of public housing properties it converts to project-based Section 8 under the Rental Assistance Demonstration program, better known as RAD, dependent on Congress’s approval. “That’s our best hope for actually preserving the deeply subsidized housing stock at this moment,” says Popkin, “unless Congress allocates more funds for tenant-based vouchers and to preserve the actual stock.” In Trump’s past budget proposals, he proposed to do away with the cap on the number of units that could be converted under RAD.
Aside from Congress’s role in intervening in budget cuts, Saadian of the National Low Income Housing Coalition says preventing these changes will require pushback from the people affected. “A lot of it will depend on really strong advocacy from people across the country who are weighing in with their members of Congress and really explaining to them how these deep cuts will harm them and their families and their neighbors and their communities,” she says. “We have a really significant threat ahead, and we are going to be mobilizing all of our partners and members to push back on that.”
Work Requirements and Term Limits
After a 2018 executive order that directed agencies to increase the use of work requirements, HUD passed a new rule in 2020 increasing the number of public housing agencies that can impose work requirements on residents.
Project 2025 predictably calls to add work requirements and term limits for recipients of housing assistance.
Saadian says that “those changes would also have to be approved by Congress, and would need 60 votes in the Senate, which means that we would really focus on encouraging Democrats and moderate Republicans to push back on that. Last time, when they proposed it, Congress rejected those proposals and didn’t move forward with them, so we would do everything we can to make sure that happens this time if they propose those sorts of harmful cuts to housing benefits.”
Popkin says that “if the housing authorities have ‘moving to work’ status,” they can already add work requirements, but, “They mostly aren’t.”
Urban Institute studied work requirements and found that as of 2015, they weren’t widely implemented—only nine housing authorities had them. Public housing has a large population of older adults and disabled people—for whom the requirements don’t make much sense. “But that doesn’t mean [the next administration] won’t try,” Popkin says.
Fair Housing
Fair housing is in danger under a new Trump administration. Matthew Murphy, executive director of the Furman Center, told Curbed in November that fair housing would likely be the focus of “some of the biggest changes” under Trump, with localities unlikely to face reporting requirements under the new administration. Doug Ryan, vice president of housing policy at Grounded Solutions Network, agrees.
“About the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule, they’ll pause that, to say it mildly,” says Ryan. “They’ll ramp down enforcement of Fair Housing Act violations, Equal Credit Opportunity Act violations and things like that.”
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing, or AFFH, is a statutory requirement of the Fair Housing Act. It means that recipients of HUD funding (and any other federal funding that might affect fair housing, such as infrastructure development) must take an extra step beyond nondiscrimination: they must actively work to reverse the results of past discriminatory housing practices and promote housing equality. However, without guidelines, it’s challenging to pin down what that means in practice. In 2015, the Obama administration provided some through a new AFFH rule. What followed was a back-and-forth: The Trump administration paused enforcement in 2018 and removed the rule in 2020, but when Biden was inaugurated the next year, the administration reintroduced an interim AFFH rule, pending the creation of a final one. A proposed final AFFH rule was announced in 2023.
The Biden administration never finalized that rule however—possibly due to concern it would impact the standing president’s chances at reelection. Now, it’s effectively too late. If the rule is issued before Biden leaves office, it will be subject to the Congressional Review Act, meaning it could be struck down. If that happens, future presidents couldn’t reintroduce the rule or anything “substantially similar.” You can find out more about that risk in this Shelterforce article.
Project 2025 directs the new administration to repeal Biden’s AFFH rulemaking, along with “any other uses of special-purpose credit authorities to further equity.”
Saadian says that fair housing and civil rights issues could be “top of their target list again” next year.
“While President Biden didn’t finalize a new rule, we could see other harms being done to fair housing,” says Saadian. “You could see them just fail to bring any enforcement actions or undermine other interpretations of law that are used to uphold people’s civil rights,” like the disparate impact rule, she says. “You definitely will see an attempt to undermine any of the work that the Biden administration did around advancing racial equity through diversity, equity, and inclusion policies.” Any such policies that were issued via executive order could be easily reversed, through separate executive orders from the incoming administration.
There’s precedent. During Trump’s presidency, the administration worked to weaken and take away fair housing protections, says Nikitra Bailey, executive vice president at the National Fair Housing Alliance.
“We also know the rollback of important regulations under the Fair Housing Act was coupled with weakening of enforcement efforts at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, in the Department of Justice, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was undermined.” The result, Bailey says, was increased housing discrimination and inequality. “So the rollback disproportionately harmed communities of color, women, people with disabilities, and families with children, LGBTQ [people], and others.”
Screening Technology
One of the risks fair housing faces: lack of protection against discriminatory screening technology.
Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development released recommendations for housing providers about how to better comply with the Fair Housing Act when screening applicants for rental housing. Over the years it’s become more commonplace for housing providers in the U.S. to use automated screening technology to decide whether an applicant is suitable for a rental, but the practice has shortcomings. Reports have shown that low-income households and households of color are often denied housing because of a report that may be inaccurate, or overbroad, or have other issues. While HUD’s guidance is not legally enforceable, housing advocates say it is a step in the right direction in terms of protecting tenants from the potentially discriminatory effects of screening technology.
But will the Trump administration ignore or withdraw HUD’s guidance? It’s highly possible.
The question was raised during a recent webinar hosted by PolicyLink, a national group that focuses on policies that affect low-income communities. During the webinar, several speakers addressed the future of the guidance and how to make tenant screening practices more equitable and less discriminatory.
Ariel Nelson, staff attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, said the guidance is at risk once Trump takes office in January 2025. Nelson says housing advocates should be urging states to step up in anticipation of the change in guard. “States could incorporate the HUD guidance into their own antidiscrimination/fair housing laws and also bring enforcement actions to hold housing providers and tenant screening companies liable and stop bad practices,” Nelson added.
Rasheedah Phillips, director of housing at PolicyLink, said the best-case scenario may be that the Trump administration ignores the guidance instead of repealing it. “If it’s still in place we can fight for enforcement,” Phillips said.
Housing for Mixed-Status Families
Project 2025’s policy guide is disparaging of HUD programs generally, which it says spread the idea that subsidized housing is a “basic life need.” Instead, it claims that these essential programs cause intergenerational poverty, constitute a threat to “traditional” families, and prevent recipients from working and improving their finances. For his part, President-elect Trump has (erroneously) pinned blame for the housing crisis on immigrants, even suggesting that deportation amounts to housing policy by decreasing demand.
During Trump’s first term in office, the administration proposed barring housing assistance for families if one person in their household was ineligible for aid due to their immigration status. The proposed change, known as the mixed-status family rule, was later withdrawn. It’s also, arguably, a fair housing violation.
“There was an enormous amount of outcry when they proposed that the first time. Thousands and thousands of people submitted public comments in opposition to that proposal, and ultimately, they didn’t move forward,” Saadian says. The proposal would have taken housing away from 25,000 families, including 55,000 children, leaving them at risk of homelessness.
It’s years down the road to get even a finalized rule . . . assuming they don’t just gut the administrative state altogether.”
Shamus Roller, National Housing Law Project
In Project 2025’s policy guide, Carson has called on the incoming Republican administration to again propose a ban on all mixed-status families from living in federal housing. That, coupled with Trump’s comments earlier this month about deporting families with mixed immigration status from the country all together, signals that it’s likely this rule could be proposed once again.
Shamus Roller, executive director of the National Housing Law Project, expects the next administration to propose a new rule shortly after Trump retakes office. But evicting all mixed-status families from HUD housing requires regulatory action. It’s not something that can be done with a stroke of a pen.
It’s “years down the road to get even a finalized rule . . . assuming they don’t just gut the administrative state altogether,” Roller says.
The rulemaking process takes quite a bit of time. The Trump administration would have to propose a new rule, after which there’s a comment period. Then HUD would have to respond, and then the proposed rule would have to be vetted by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs and the Office of Management and Budget—along with other steps. There will also be plenty of advocacy campaigns to fight against the proposed rule, and if it is eventually finalized, Roller says the National Housing Law Project and other groups would fight it in court.
“That can really drag out that process, especially around a rule like mixed-status families, which I think so clearly violates the Fair Housing Act,” Roller says.
But just announcing a proposed rule change could have detrimental effects on families. Some families who are currently living with an ineligible immigrant might believe they must move out of HUD housing immediately. “Part of our job will be to tell families . . . don’t move. [This] is just a proposed rule . . . don’t give up your housing,” says Roller. “We’re going to fight this thing out.”
This is something that happened during Trump’s first term in office with the administration’s proposed public charge rule, which would have prevented a person from obtaining a green card if they accepted certain public benefits. Roller says the National Housing Law Project saw immigrants who were eligible for housing vouchers give up them up for fear they would not be able to get a green card in the future.
“This kind of tells you some of the dynamic around the Trump administration. There’s a lot of focus on people who are undocumented,” says Roller. “The [incoming administration is] also interested in penalizing people who are in the country legally, and the public charge [rule] is kind of the perfect example of that.”
Roller says the National Housing Law Project is hiring additional litigators in preparation for what’s to come in 2025, and they’ll be training legal aid attorneys and folks on the ground, so they understand what’s happening and the rights folks have.
About the Author
Tags
Comments
20 thoughts on “How Fast Could the Trump Administration Make HUD, Fair Housing Changes?”
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
I am a 61 year old disabled woman living on SSI alone. Yes. It places me well below the United States poverty level. I am enrolled in the section 811 housing program, which is project based. When I turn 62, I will be automatically placed in the section 202 program for the elderly. Will Project 2025, dismantle the 811 and 202 programs? If so, I will be homeless. I’m terrified.
We are a community of children, disabled and elderly people currently fighting to preserve our homes from a developer who bought two properties totally 70+ units (2-3 bedroom houses and townhouses). We are considering suit against the seller and buyer of the properties for violation of LIHTC rules regarding the sale of properties. Since the regulations existed before the Trump administration, will our ability to sue be affected by the expected changes in HUD regulations? Thank you
I hope Trump’s Administration will address Section 8 fraud! There are people who live across the street from me who recently had an eviction hearing November 19th where the City attorney addressed the housing fraud that had taken place to tens of thousands of dollars. According to HUD the penalty for committing fraud is is termination of assistance. Well, for some reason the folk across the street have been allowed to remain on the program and not have to pay any money back. Also according to HUD the penalty for committing fraud include Criminal prosecution yet, the folk across the street have not faced any of that. I know what I’m posting about because I attended that hearing being that the folk across the street are also a neighborhood nuisance. Illegal activities of All Sorts take place, one of the tenants of that house was just recently convicted of a felony for making terroristic threats against the police department. No one in that house Works a job and they know how to play the system. So I am all for Trump cleaning the system up. I wish I were on his task force! I pay taxes yet Folk as I described above get to live Scott free and I am certainly sick of it.
That wouldn’t only effect people committing fraud but older, disabled, children and people who even with program are living in poverty already and make them homeless. Many of Trump’s own supporters would be out as well instead of worrying that someone is getting help and you aren’t worry about how his policies will affect you
Getting rid of these programs will only add to the already extremely high homeless population.Which will then Cause Rent to increase even more,Since there will be A high demand to rent.Rent is already high All across the Nation. And keeps going up every year.This Will not only affect the Low income families that are these programs,But also the “Working Class” and “middle class” Americans as well. These Landlords rather they be private or corporate For damn sure don’t give a F about how many hours You have to work to be able to pay This ridiculous rent,All they care about is Money.Lets prey Congress doesn’t allow this to happen.
I am disabled and on SSDI I was homeless for 10 years I was finally about to obtain housing under the home choice voucher program last year and it literally saved my life . Hopefully they don’t cut funding for American citizens that legitimately need these programs.
I live in subsidized housing and my out-of-pocket rent is $927 I actually pay more than section 8 pays towards my rent. I am disabled on SSI and between the 967 I get That is going to just cover my rent as it is. Taking away a housing voucher is going to have me in pretty much most of the people in my apartment complex homeless because it is a low income apartment complex. I surely will become homeless because I certainly can’t pay the $1,900 with my voucher gone. I just don’t get it I voted for Trump and now I’m sorry so sorry that I did because all he’s doing is taking from the poor meals on Wheels, Head start, school lunches housing everything I feel bamboozled because he swung a lot of votes his way this year that voted otherwise and we’re getting kicked in the ass for it. Why don’t you go through the housing vouchers and weed out the people that have felonies or people living on the lease with them illegally and leave us American citizens alone and help us like we helped him get elected
It is morally and legally wrong to name biased “information “ as essential.
Now, This comment will be filtered through your “spam protection “ system. How convenient.
Michelle, are you finally realizing that he never gave a damn about you? You drank the cult cool aide and expect to live?
I don’t think the whole program should be defunded but I do feel requirements should be adjusted. If you able bodied then you should work everyone has short comings so there should be limits to how long an able bodied person can receive assistance. Old and disabled persons shouldn’t be defunded because other recipients just don’t want to work . New requirements need to arise to help and assistance people to stand on there own not enable them to be “taken care of”.Public housing should have time limits just like they have income limits . I know for a fact four generations of one family live in the same low income apartment complex in my city.In order to receive benefits to any government funding I feel a plan needs to be made on how the recipient will be able to make money so they don’t need funding . I think a 5 yr plan with benefits is long enough to be a productive citizen with a career path that enables them to be independent. Why should I pay my whole life for someone to receive benefits there whole life . HUD without setting limits on how long you can receive funding is why there is a waiting list and why it’s 3 to 7 years at that . More ppl would benefit if the criteria for benefits changed . Pop a drug test on these able bodied recipients and take there benefits and I bet that waiting list would get a lot shorter. We have random drug test at real jobs so it’s just prep for the real world . I’m tired of my tax dollars paying for food stamps for ppl in low income housing receiving utility checks to lay on couch get high and eat the kids snacks .
I am sorry for your predicament, Ms. Stacy, but unfortunately this whole debacle was completely predictable with a vote for Trump. You, and many unsuspecting, well-meaning folks have truly been bamboozled and this is only the very small tip of a far-reaching iceberg. Without casting judgement toward people who honestly believed the lies and false promises of the current administration, I have to say that this very scary situation could have been avoided but now it is too late. So all of us-democrats, republicans, independents and non-voters-will unfortunately reap the collateral damage of a “Precedent” who is self-serving, dishonest, and cruel.
I am elderly and disabled. I have lived in subsidized housing for over 20 years. I have always made a point of knowing my neighbors all over the community. To be honest, in a building of 12 apartments, there are currently six apartments that don’t have unauthorized people living in them. There have been as few as two apartments out of 12 we are not violating our leases this way. There have been many people hiding from the law here because they’re criminals. Some have been discovered and arrested. There are others who are good people who are here in the country illegally. This apartment complex is huge and I can honestly say between 40 and 60% of the people living here should not be. They are mostly immigrants and friends of immigrants. The office manager is also an immigrant was here illegally and was one of many who were given amnesty by one of our presidents. She makes it her purpose to cram illegal immigrants in here thinking she will never be discovered. She teaches them to hide their money as they all have jobs. She teaches them what to say when people ask them questions. they’re trying to build a better life for their families and I can’t say I wouldn’t do the same thing if I had a family myself. I don’t know. But it is fraud on a large scale. Surely there must be a better way. Most of the families here have multiple cars, like three or four. There vehicles, jewelry, clothing, extra activities etc indicate just how well off they are financially. And yet there are so many others who sincerely need the housing that these well off people are using. It isn’t fair. It isn’t fair housing and it is not equal opportunity fair housing either. Why doesn’t someone look into these things? HUD’s fair housing office refuses to investigate anything. Perhaps because they’re not funded well enough. Anytime they decide to investigate something they warn the manager ahead of time, who intern warns the residence who are going to be investigated. What the hell?? better oversight is much needed.
Nancy Lee, I can’t help but to think of Dunning-Kruger when people like you think you have it all figured out by snapping your fingers while those who study these things their whole lives, haven’t. It is willful ignorance. Sadly, yes, there are some permanently damaged people you would not dream of hiring, in public housing. Yes, they will be there until they die if government doesn’t address the underlying cause of poverty, healthcare and drug abuse. Unless you are stupid enough to think Americans just have different DNA, the only explanation for America’s homelessness problem, is a societal issue caused by our economic system.
My daughter is getting set to begin dialysis as she is stage 4 Kidney disease with nearly no functioning of her kidneys due to a incurable kidney disease. She is on housing and this will be catastrophic for her if something happens to public housing. People tried to warn the ones that were foolish enough to vote Trump into office….now you will see what you will get for putting in a person who could have cared less about any of you.
On the one hand, I feel for you deeply. On the other hand, having lived with family members who bought into the Donald cult, I feel a sick and twisted form of satisfaction from seeing the people who voted this authoritarian regime into office suffer. I don’t want to feel that way, but I have seen time and time again these people feel 0 empathy for the suffering of others, and indeed, seem to get off on it. These people, although they are certainly being taken advantage of by a psychopathic pathological liar and I don’t fully blame them, are by and large and filled with nothing but hate for their fellow Americans and it is satisfying to watch them get a taste of their own cruelty. The cognitive dissidence from these people, is frankly astounding. 33% of this county is on government assistance of some sort, including many in the cult, and yet these people rally behind him when he says he is going to take those subsidies away because the people on them are “parasites.” On issues of diversity, if you are a women, if you are a person of color, if you are gay, if you are trans- basically if you are anything other than a rich, straight, Christian, white male your rights are going away. Just the other day, I was watching a large group of women in government complaining because they were losing their jobs due to Donald’s DEI policies- these were women who were trump supporters. You know what they said? They said they “thought these policies would only apply to people of color.” Before that, I watched a group of legal immigrants that Donald was getting ready to deport (who also voted for Donald, mind you) complain. You see, they thought he would only get rid of “those other immigrants.” We all told you this is what was coming, and this is what he wanted. It was obvious. The evidence couldn’t have been any clearly. He was not sneaky, in the slightest. He is not a very intelligent man. And it is only going to get way, way worse. We are only a couple of weeks in. Civil rights are going away. (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/trump-reversing-justice-departments-civil-rights-policies-rcna189657) Fair elections are going away. (https://apnews.com/article/voting-congress-citizenship-voter-id-republicans-88342cf09d01b0555851aa3d64c45432) Concentration camps are already being built in Guantanamo Bay. (https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-he-will-instruct-homeland-security-pentagon-prepare-migrant-facility-2025-01-29/) Free press is going away. (https://www.brookings.edu/articles/donald-trump-has-threatened-to-shut-down-broadcasters-but-can-he/) The first amendment is going away. Donald has divided this county, and created an us versus them mentality, but the craziest thing is 95% of the people who voted for him are not in the “us” category. Like I said before, unless you are a rich, white, straight, Christian, non-disabled male these next four years (at least- but likely longer) are going to be very, very difficult for you. Donald often speaks of the “immigrants” and the “parasites” and how they are ruining the county. News flash: he’s talking about you. He was always talking about you.
I feel all that’s able to work should work I feel if you on the program HUD should have a work program which will force many men and women to work, I’m a product of the system I worked my way off the program. I’m a property manager and for warn my residents that this day was coming some people have been on the program so long and never worked one resident asked if she could get help on her resume but there was nothing to put on it. This what I mean about work or schooling programs some people dont even know how to work a computer. I’m praying this wont affect my seniors, disable and handicapped because this would hurt them badly. I just dont know this could cost us our jobs to only God knows if you believe you can see we living in the last days all I can say is prepare yourself.
I have been a manager in the residential rental industry since I lost my business when NAFTA past in the 1990s.. In thirty years I have seen the reliance on section 8 grow and grow. Now it represents half the applications here in Northern California. Taxpayers subsidizing section 8 is propping up rents. If Trump shut funding down rents would drop by at least 10 to 15%. There is no justice when one apartment has two or three lessees working 2 jobs each to make market rent and just across the hall a single mom with three kids by different fathers is getting full rent subsidy and nobody works! Why aren’t fathers forced to pay? Why do taxpayers have to pay for people who make extremely poor decisions.? To make matters worse I see section 8 residents driving Mercedes. Now that I’m retiring on a foxed income should I be asking who will pay for me?
Hello,
I’m Jose Maldonado and need the president to know all the facts as I would believe that make all the difference in the situation that has been persisting to have been causing a problem for the fact is that a lot of these problems aren’t even coming from where they are to be coming from and aren’t the truth about what really the actual facts of what happens here because a lot of it was just used as an excuse to hide certain facts and details from everyone but these facts I must for warn you first before having me speak to someone about the situation is because a lot of it may be of a alarming and unnatural irregularitys to persist to have caused a lot of unwanted excuses lies and deception. I hoped to have this addressed promptly. Do to the facts of who and where I am in this situation is the fact that Iam the very person who had resolution the whole estate property and saved all the people living there a place to live in my noble act where I came unto the needs of the estate and welfare of the people I had truly contributed to the property the people in the situation to the point where it had fell up onto me a point of recognition coming from the committee or I mean myself that wasn’t to be disguised and needs to be addressed I mean fairly addressed I have solid proof of the facts about me being fruaduntly deployed from were I if you don’t mind please excuse me but I am the true contributor and it is my find I heard for some reason even though there wasn’t anyone else around and I wasn’t exactly sure or of what but I know one thing I heard a man or a well mannered man to had said I believe he said something was at a miss I believe that to be the truth because it hit me right then I believe that it was the people from the assembly or alliance though the intrusive act that wasn’t permitted or was not applicable weren’t to be were they weren’t to be filling in when they were employed there they had no place to be coming from and intruded on my find by overstepping there boundaries they know they broke into the office of the cooperative and try to for no good reason probably approach the paperwork that they were not to even know to who that were even to be about the Sherri elder and David magee had fraudulently try to have me subdued me and have filed false claims towards me without even being in a legal way with the company they have no jurisdiction to do so can you coming from to have this done to me they’ve been trying to keep me under wraps they haven’t been doing legally and they have too many false crimes against me and falsely committed to the wrong in all of this and for what nothing. They also I heard had tried to open a line of credit without my doing so that being well I mean how do I even come into all this without my acknowledgement or consent I mean I know what I mean but iv been having a lot of trouble finding a attorney that will take my case do to I think they tried to have me cut off by dirty politicians into that that only they can speak unto of is well I don’t know but I apologize if there able to have this situation looked at but not without it being advised by you first in the way I stated earlier I mean at least not without that being refuted please have someone contact me thank you.1111 hst Davis ca 95616 just ask for me tell know how to get a hold of me
Not everybody that has section 8 is fraudulent and I’m a perfect example. I worked with my disability until I was in my mid-40s and I had it my entire life. I am now 53 years old trying to get SSI and Trump is dismantling everything. If he wants to go after the people that are fraudulent he can be my guest because that is not right but as far as people that are legitimate like me and paid my taxes like me and worked with a disability my entire life like me? Leave me alone. But feel free to nail the fraudulent people I could show you a couple of apartments in my building that are here to party and don’t have a disability.
I am a disabled 54 year old man on Section 8 Housing Voucher program. I cannot even stand on my feet longer than 15 minutes or walk very far unassisted. If Trump passes this it will be a death sentence for me and my spouse whom is disabled as well with MS. My entire complex is a Section 8 apt . That will put along with me , 300 plus families a d disabled elderly people on the street and a lot if us won’t survive out there. The blood will be on his hands but I truly don’t think he cares. This is not how I thought I’d spend my later years of life, waiting until they throw me in the street. To say I’m scared is a understatement. Hopefully congress will thwart this is booths plan to further push the gentrification movement. Pray people pray.